Chicago products liability attorneys address auto defects

healyscanlonveugelergannon • December 2, 2015

Recently this blog discussed the major recall of defective Takata airbags. Although airbags are meant to make vehicles safer, and indeed have saved many lives in Chicago and nationwide, if they rupture or improperly deploy, they can be very dangerous. Situations like this show that even though automobiles have more safety features now than in years past, defects can still occur that injure or kill consumers.

There are so many ways that a motor vehicle can be found defective. In addition to defective airbags, another safety feature that could be defective is seat belts, particularly those that de-latch during a collision. Other types of defects include car fires and defective tires. Defective gas tanks can cause a vehicle to catch on fire, which could prove deadly. In addition, there have been various recalls over the years of tires that were found to be defective, for example the year 2000 Bridgestone/Firestone tire recall.

In some ways, lawsuits can help make vehicles safer. For example, in response to rollover lawsuits, safety features for sports utility vehicles were developed, including stronger roofs and stability controls. Unfortunately, sometimes a vehicle safety feature or recall cannot prevent all deaths from occurring.

The Chicago attorneys at Healy Scanlon Law Firm have handled many defective vehicle lawsuits, and fight for their clients to achieve a fair result. For example, they were some of the first to take on SUV rollover lawsuits in the state with regards to the Bronco II SUV. They are experienced in addressing complex situations regarding their clients’ wrongful death cases. It is important for anyone who has lost a loved one due to dangerous and defective automotive products to consider their options and consult with a  Chicago products liability  attorney if necessary.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.