Child safety seats recalled for defective buckles

healyscanlonveugelergannon • February 21, 2014

A child safety seat is used to protect a child from harm in the event of a motor-vehicle crash, which is why many Chicago-area parents put them in their vehicles. Unfortunately, sometimes car seats suffer the same fate as other products that are found to be defective and are recalled.

Most recently, almost 3.8 million car seats made by Graco Children’s Products Inc. have been recalled because their buckles may not unlatch, posing a hazard to a child during an emergency. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says Graco should recall another 1.8 million rear-facing infant car seats because this product shares the same type of buckle as the recalled child safety seat.

The product recall affects 11 models of car seats sold by Graco from 2009 to 2013. Federal safety regulators point out that the defect could make it hard for a parent or others to remove a child from the seat during a fire or after an accident, increasing the risks of injury. The NHTSA points out that some consumers who had installed the seats needed to cut the belt material just to remove their children.

The manufacturer notes that no injuries have yet been reported, but the NHTSA has received 80 complaints about the seats.

Manufacturers of products for children and infants such as toys, strollers and car seats have a legal responsibility to make their products safe. If the product is defectively designed or unreasonably dangerous, the manufacturer can be held liable for damages in the event of an injury or death caused by the product defect.

Defective products are something that manufacturers have a legal duty to prevent. In the event a child is injured due to a defective car seat, an  Illinois defective product s attorney  can bring a claim against the manufacturer on the family’s behalf.

Source:  Huffingtonpost, “Graco Car Seat Recall Applies to 3.8M Units of 11 Different Models,” Dee-Ann Durbin, Feb. 11, 2014

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.