Consumer safety alert: defective bean bag chairs cause two deaths

healyscanlonveugelergannon • December 30, 2015

When one thinks of a defective children’s product, they may think of cribs with drop-down railings or small toys that are choking hazards. Yet there are many every-day products that can pose a significant hazard to children in Chicago and nationwide, particularly when they are defective. It is important that these defective products are taken off of store shelves as soon as possible. Unfortunately, as one recent recall shows, simply issuing a recall doesn’t mean that an unsafe product will stay out of the hands of children.

Recently, the  U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission , alongside the company Ace Bayou have reissued a second recall of over two million bean bag chairs. Two children lost their lives after unzipping the chair, crawling inside and then suffocating on the foam pellets inside. One victim was a 13-year-old boy, and the other was a three-year-old girl. A six-year-old boy also reportedly opened the bag and got some foam pellets in his nose and mouth, but he survived.

The chairs have both an outer zipper that is lacking a pull tab, and an inner zipper. A repair kit is being offered at no cost that would make it so that the zipper cannot be used. As of right now, only about 790 consumers have received the repair kit. The bean bag chairs at issue were offered for sale from 1995 to 2013.

No parent deserves to lose a child to a defective product. Unfortunately, as was the case here, initial recalls are not always effective. When such deaths occur, it is important for parents to remember that they may have legal options for recovery. A  Chicago products liability  attorney may be able to educate consumers as to their rights when there is a death due to a defective product.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.