I lost a loved one on the job; can I sue?

healyscanlonveugelergannon • February 17, 2017

Like all of the other states, Illinois has a workers’ compensation system in place to ensure the families of employees get some compensation when their loved one be killed or even seriously injured in connection with their work. Workers’ compensation also pays benefits to families who lose a loved-one due to a work-related illness, such as cancers related to asbestos exposure.

However, in exchange for these benefits, which get awarded on a no-fault basis and are supposed to be paid relatively quickly, families give up important rights, including the  right to sue  their loved one’s employer for wrongful death. Moreover, workers’ compensation does not pay for everything and definitely does not compensate for emotional damages like the mental anguish and suffering a grieving family faces after a tragic work-related death.

There are certain exceptions to this general rule, however, so a family shouldn’t automatically assume that workers’ compensation is their only remedy following a workplace death. For instance, an employer will remain fully responsible for any intentional injuries inflicted upon a worker. Perhaps more importantly, though, an employee’s family can still sue if they can show the injury for which they are suing does not fall within the purview of Illinois’ workers’ compensation system.

A common example of when this rule might apply would be if a Chicago-area employee gets hurt by a piece of equipment or a dangerous product while at work. The employee could still sue the maker of that product in court, even if the manufacturer of the product happens to be the person’s employer as well. In this case, the suit is not so much about an employee suing an employer, as any Illinois resident would be allowed to pursue compensation for a defective product.

While many  Chicago work-related deaths  at construction sites or in other venues will fall exclusively within the workers’ compensation system, a grieving family should not automatically assume that those benefits are all that are available to them.

$1,000,000.00 Verdict

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.

$40 Million Settlement

March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.