Is a facility operator accountable for a boating accident?

healyscanlonveugelergannon • October 10, 2014

The owner of any property is responsible for making sure that the premises is well maintained and that necessary safety measures are in place to reduce the probability of an accident. The owner is also responsible for providing adequate warnings to people asking them not to enter his or her property if it is in an unsafe condition.

The laws of premises liability in Illinois, and other parts if the country, extend to cover personal as well as commercial properties.  Chicago personal injury  experts may have a clearer insight into how injuries connected to recreational activities can extend into a case of premises liability.

Many commercial properties allow its patrons to engage in various recreational activities such as boating or jet skiing. As such, there may be a possibility of a drowning incident as a result of a  boating accident. The matter of establishing liability is such a case may be somewhat tricky. It may entirely depend on the factors surrounding and leading up to the accident. It may also be a case where nobody is clearly at fault.

However, as far as the legal liability of the premise operator is concerned, he or she may be found responsible for the death or injury of the plaintiff resulting from a boating accident if certain state and federal regulations regarding operating such a business were not adhered to.

Facilities offering such recreational activities are required by law to meet certain safety standards and failing to meet those, the operator can be held responsible for any accident in which his or her negligence can be illustrated in court.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.