Resolving Illinois residents’ boating accident claims

healyscanlonveugelergannon • August 27, 2015

Water sports and recreational activities such as boating and fishing are popular hobbies among Illinois residents and even for tourists who come and visit each year. Boating, or any other recreational activity, where the people on the boat have to essentially depend completely on their boat operator and instructor can also prove to be inherently dangerous at times when the necessary precautions have not been taken.

Boating accidents can lead to major problems for families and tourists who hire boats from boating companies every year. Such boating accidents can even lead to serious injuries as well as fatalities. Thus, the state authorities employ various initiatives to raise public awareness about the perils of sea. There are even federal laws in place to promote safe boating for everyone.

Boating accident victims who suffer from serious injuries can often be left with lifelong impairments and disabilities. Thus, boating companies must follow all rules and guidelines especially when they take on paying customers who depend on them for their safety. Boating companies have also been sued by victims of boating accidents on the grounds that the boating company or their boat operator had been negligent.

Like in most negligence cases,  boating accident  cases also rely on tort law principles. Hence, the burden of proof in a boating accident case lies on the plaintiffs who have been injured or who have family members who have been injured. The attorneys at the Healy Scanlon Law Firm usually consult with expert witnesses in addition to conducting their own thorough investigation into the accident as well as the impugned negligence of the boating company and the operator in order to assign responsibility for the accident. This could be the firs step to take for a successful lawsuit. For more on boating accidents, visit our  webpage.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.