Safe splash pad construction in Chicago

healyscanlonveugelergannon • June 30, 2016

With summer in full force, many residents in Illinois are looking for ways to cool off in the heat. While some people may think about going to public pools, other people are taking a non-traditional route. Splash pads have become more popular in recent years. These spraying parks can be fun for children and families of all ages. They can appear safer then pools since the water is typically shallow.

However, splash pads need to be built correctly in order to prevent recreational injuries to the young children and families that use these facilities. Without the correct safety measures in place, people can suffer serious injuries within a splash pad.

The  safety measures  begin with the construction of the splash pad. Designers and construction crews need to be aware of these important safety features. For example, the play surfaces within the splash pad should have no more than eight percent slope. Additionally, materials used in the splash pad should be non-slip in order to try and prevent falls while children are playing. These playgrounds should also be designed to avoid stagnant water or retain water deeper than 15 centimeters.

The design should also include backflow prevention and appropriate grating in order to avoid pool like suction in the drains. Additionally, the equipment should be designed in a way where it can be maintained and sanitized regularly.

By properly designing and maintaining splash pads, they can be a fun recreational activity for families in Illinois. However, such activities can also lead to dangerous injuries for individuals. When this occurs, people should understand their legal rights. When recreational activities result in injuries, a lawsuit may be appropriate. Individual should consider speaking with a  Chicago personal injury  attorney for more specific legal advice.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.