What are the types of defects in a product liability case?

healyscanlonveugelergannon • May 31, 2016

Most people understand the feeling of disappointment that can accompany a bad purchase. People may feel regret or anger when they buy something that doesn’t work right, breaks easily or is poorly made. People may feel as if their hard earned money has gone down the drain.

Product defects go beyond these simple inconveniences and disappointments. Products that have been dangerously made can lead to serious injuries to consumers using the products. These types of product defects can lead to product liability suits.

There are three main  types  of product defects that can result in a lawsuit. First, there are manufacturing defects. These are defects that occur during the manufacturing process that are not supposed to be present in the products.

The next type of defect is a defect in marketing. These are defects in the product’s label, or marketing that do not properly warn consumers about the product. This could include missing or incomplete warnings, instructions or labeling.

Finally, there are design defects. These are defects that are inherently present in the product’s design. So, even when the product is made correctly the defect is still present and can cause injuries.

When a product has one of these defects and injuries occur, the company that made the product may be held liable under product liability laws. Injured people may be able to recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages and more related to the injuries caused by the  defective product. A Chicago product liability attorney can give specific legal advice to people who have been injured by product defects.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.