When Illinois seller’s response to complaints are unsatisfactory

healyscanlonveugelergannon • July 3, 2015

When a consumer is not satisfied with a product because of a defect, the first step that the person should take is to file a complaint with the seller. The process for filing such consumer complaints was discussed in an earlier  blog post. As that blog post mentioned, it is the duty of a seller to respond to the complaint and to take it seriously. However, in certain cases, a consumer may not be satisfied with the seller’s response. Nonetheless, that does not mean that the situation has been resolved. On the contrary, the consumer has the option of involving other appropriate people in order to resolve the situation.

According to the law, consumers who have been harmed by a dangerous or defective product have the right to seek compensation for damages.

All states, and even cities and towns, have consumer protection agencies that help consumers to resolve their complaints. At the state level, a consumer can also contact the regulatory agency that caters to the seller’s specific industry. Additionally, consumers can take their concerns to state and local licensing agencies. Those state and local agencies mediate consumer complaints, conduct necessary investigations and prosecute sellers who violate  consumer safety  laws.

In addition to government agencies, a consumer may also take the complaint against a seller to various non-governmental organizations, such as trade associations, the Better Business Bureau, national consumer associations and the media.

However, when a defective product injures or kills a person, it is very important to hold the negligent parties accountable. The injured or their families may be left with huge medical expenses, lost wages and other damages. A  product liability lawsuit  can help compensate them for these damages, while also encouraging safer products in the future.

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.
March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.