Who is responsible in a medical malpractice suit?

healyscanlonveugelergannon • December 1, 2016

Though they may have superior medical knowledge, at the end of the day, all doctors are humans and humans are not perfect. Unfortunately, there are times when human errors occur during a patient’s treatment in Chicago, whether it is a misdiagnosis, the prescription or administration of wrong drugs or surgical mistake. Each of these instances can lead to severe injury, a prolonged illness or in extreme instances, death.

Although it is presumed that all necessary precautions are taken when it comes to a patient’s health, as it is a doctor and medical professional’s job and duty is to care for a patient, this is not always the case. As mentioned above, medical malpractice may take many forms. So who is responsible in the event of medical malpractice?

Every situation is of course different, but when looking at the factors that led to the medical malpractice, there are often multiple parties responsible. Under the legal doctrine “respondeat superior”, employers may be held responsible for the actions of their employees, including neglects and malpractice. Hospitals where a medical procedure took place may be found liable for the actions or inactions of their employees. This includes not only doctors, but nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians and physician’s assistants.

While some physicians are employees of their hospital, it is not uncommon for doctors to be considered independent contractors. This means that hospitals with contracted doctors are not liable under the respondeat superior doctrine. This does not mean that doctors, including doctors in the Chicago area, are not responsible for any  Chicago medical malpractice  suits that may arise. These determinations may be difficult to make, especially when a Chicago resident is recuperating from a condition caused by the negligence. An experienced attorney can wade through the legalities on their behalf.

Source:  findlaw.com, “ Medical Malpractice: Who Can Be Sued? ” Accessed Nov. 29, 2016

$1,000,000.00 Verdict

April 13, 2026
Attorneys Michael P. Scanlon and Timothy J. Ganshirt secured a $1,000,000.00 Verdict for their client, Jane Doe. Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by her acupuncturist when she went to his office for treatment. Prior to trial, the Defendant did not make a settlement offer. At trial, the Defendant's attorneys argued that Plaintiff consented and recommended that the jury award a maximum of $7,000 to $8,000 to the Plaintiff, if the jury were to award anything. Instead, the jury returned a verdict for $1,000,000.00. Michael and Tim are filing a motion to add interest, fees, and costs to the verdict. If granted, thetotal judgment could reach up to $1,234,333.06.  This case highlights the importance of making sure that you choose attorneys who are willing to go to trial to ensure your case gets the full value it deserves.

$40 Million Settlement

March 25, 2026
Matthew M. Gannon and Michael P. Scanlon secured $40,000,000 for an operating engineer who suffered from third degree burns following a blast at an industrial facility.